3 ms·

You need commentary

• hardwaresofton 5y ago
  I'd go the other way, please don't add commentary and a good way to monetize this kind of site would be to charge for access to a separate related forum/discourse instance. Optionally you could show comments if someone wants to see them on the page (or include a link to the dedicated forum thread for every post). Having commentary on a site like this is a great way to turn into WSB/StockTwits and/or have people attempting to pump and dump.
  • Doches 5y ago
    > Having commentary on a site like this is a great way to turn into WSB/StockTwits I don't know; I'd be pretty pleased to be running (and monetizing!) a site at the scale & impact of WSB.
    • hardwaresofton 5y ago
      Fair point -- if the goal is monetization/stickiness-for-advertising instead of quality (no moral judgement on my part) then maybe it does make sense to encourage the "engagement" of users in that way. I wonder if it's harder to stand-out as an WSB/StockTwits alternative or as a product for investors looking for a "better" news source.
  • rufasterisco 5y ago
    HN biggest achievement is its civil, informative, curated, comment section. Without comments, you have "stock news from 40+ sources", just not "Hacker News-ish".
• mjmasia 5y ago
  I really appreciate both points of view here! Thanks for your feedback :) I honestly just built this project as a tool to aggregate market news for myself and build something simple with Elixir + Phoenix. I don't have any plans to add commentary – but I do intend to keep it running and building things that are helpful to myself and the community!