5 ms·
OP is correct. double your salary at your job, but have to take verbal abuse and berated from your 'boss' and see how that paycheck affects your life
by kickout 5y ago
OP is correct. double your salary at your job, but have to take verbal abuse and berated from your 'boss' and see how that paycheck affects your life
- hypnoscripto 5y agoIf your salary is high enough that you can save some money then you aren’t required to put up with bullshit in order to keep eating food.
- bnj 5y agoDo you mean that by saving money people can leave the profession sooner or at least move to a school with more favorable working conditions? If so, maybe you’ve hit on a kernel of truth: we can’t risk paying teachers enough that they’d have the financial security to leave a bad work situation.
- throwaway894345 5y agoAm I the only one who thinks “we should pay teachers more so they can afford a new profession because public education is horrible” is the wrong takeaway? Like, why not fix public education (e.g., more teacher autonomy) or at least support some voucher program so more teachers can be private school teachers?
- hypnoscripto 5y agoSee my reply above. I didn’t think this idea would be controversial. Working conditions should improve when the workers have other options.
- hutzlibu 5y ago"Working conditions should improve when the workers have other options." So when the workers have not other options, working conditions can stay low?
- hypnoscripto 5y agoIt’s not a “should” it’s just what happens.
- hypnoscripto 5y agoI mean that teachers would have a credible threat of leaving and hopefully administrations and school boards would respond to the threat by improving conditions.
- Jare 5y agoHigh salaries means more people looking to get in, so it's not like administrators would risk running out of teachers. (I'm all for financially rewarding good teachers, but because their work is incredibly valuable. It's just ab incredibly hard context in which to separate the good and the bad without creating perverse incentives)
- fakedang 5y agoInvestment bankers barely enjoy their jobs and take a lot of abuse from their bosses, yet there is no shortage of banker aspirants. Some even stay for the long haul, or go to even worse working conditions such as private equity, for more money.
- kickout 5y agoInvestment bankers also have autonomy and generally work in small teams. Not responsible for human beings, just capital. Also if a IB gets fired (but is good) they are probably employed within a week. A good teacher that gets fired (for fighting the bad administration? Good luck...
- fakedang 5y agoTo draw parallels, an investment banker who goes against the system would likewise not be hired, but rather virtually blackballed. And good luck for whistle blowers in any financial institution. Also investment bankers have as much autonomy as a client allows them to. And MDs and VPs are as much responsible for their subordinates and client relationships (although not in the same way as teachers are for students).
- thomastjeffery 5y agoYet public school teachers do this all the time. They take low pay and a bad work environment, and keep teaching anyway. Why? Because they are passionate about teaching. I had several high-school teachers who weren't financially comfortable, yet still chose to spend hundreds or even thousands on their students during a school year. Of course, those teachers would have been much more effective if they were in a financially stable position. I also would have had fewer quality teachers leave.