3 ms·
Damn, it started well but you went into some really deep prejudice. I’ll take note that Taiwanese are the best ROI for low cost immigrants - apparently much bet
by jiofih 5y ago
Damn, it started well but you went into some really deep prejudice. I’ll take note that Taiwanese are the best ROI for low cost immigrants - apparently much better than Mexicans.
How about putting some reins on the real estate and trading markets instead of “getting better immigrants”? Sounds a little bit more logical.
- l33t2328 5y ago> but you went into some really deep prejudice Can you elaborate what deep prejudice you got from that comment?
- CameronNemo 5y agoBuilding a wall to keep the Mexicans out. Seems pretty fucked up from my POV, somebody who has lived in SoCal for nearly 25 years.
- HideousKojima 5y agoWhat obligation does a country have to non-citizens who entered (and stayed in) the country illegally? FWIW I grew up in San Diego county, less than 20 miles from the border
- CameronNemo 5y agoWhat obligation do I have to sign on to exclusionary immigration policy. The southern border is just a line in the sand. No party (US or Mexico) has a reasonable claim to the land to begin with. Building a wall is just a dumb move regardless.
- atweiden 5y agoIf a state’s borders aren’t enforced, either those borders are not in fact the state’s real borders, or the people residing within those “borders” are living in a failed state.
- CameronNemo 5y agoI am not in favor of states. And as I said before, the southern border is mostly made up. People crossed it for thousands of years without some crappy wall in the way. They will continue to cross it even with a wall.
- atweiden 5y ago> I am not in favor of states. What are you in favor of, then?
- CameronNemo 5y agoNature. Genetic diversity. Freedom. A border wall is an ecological tragedy.
- CydeWeys 5y agoThis logic isn't remotely sound. It's a ridiculous false dichotomy. There's a third option: It's a normal state that hasn't built walls around it like some kind of medieval walled cities. Do you think every state that isn't completely walled off (there are basically none besides the Vatican) is "failed"?
- atweiden 5y agoWho said anything about walls? A state’s borders are defined by the land area over which it upholds its own legal system. If a state’s legal system is unenforceable within its so called “borders”, then by definition those are either no longer its borders, or the people living within the land area over which the state’s legal system cannot be enforced are living in a failed state. The borders will have become disputed in that case.
- l33t2328 5y agoIt’s to keep anyone out who isn’t coming here legally. Mexicans who are going to follow our laws(starting at the border) and will be a net benefit to the US will be welcomed.
- jiofih 5y agoI can understand that sentiment in countries where you have a very strong (and expensive) social safety net. It’s funny to hear it from the USA, which is not that, and was built by immigrants… Do you also deport citizens who are not a “net benefit”? Would be the logical thing to do.
- l33t2328 5y agoThe USA has a very strong and expensive social safety net. No, I do not want citizens deported; they are citizens. However, we should be extremely selective with immigrants.