3 ms·
They are saying the slurs could be intended to throw you off of the corporate scent and should be discarded as any evidence one way or the other who commissione
by DangitBobby 5y ago
They are saying the slurs could be intended to throw you off of the corporate scent and should be discarded as any evidence one way or the other who commissioned the creation.
- tedunangst 5y agoIt seems like most people are saying that all evidence found and all evidence not found should be interpreted to prove Sony or the MPAA or whoever is responsible. Evidence they didn't is fake and proof they did. Absence of evidence is proof of a coverup.
- edgyquant 5y agoSounds like your typical conspiracy theory.
- squiggleblaz 5y agoThat isn't the claim. The claim is the inclusion of a racial slur doesn't tell us anything. Instinctively, when I read it, I thought, "Oh, this is written by a independent vigilante, not by stakeholder". But other commenters are right. It is compatible with being written by an independent vigilante, and it is compatible with being written by or on behalf of stakeholders. I will withhold conclusion until further evidence is tendered.