4 ms·
The first point addressed the suggest that any engineer who didn’t get their license must be suspect and is cheating the rules. You seem to have missed the leg
by antiterra 5y ago
The first point addressed the suggest that any engineer who didn’t get their license must be suspect and is cheating the rules.
You seem to have missed the legal argument in the Oregon case which had nothing to do with an industrial exemption.
- mcguire 5y ago"The first point addressed the suggest that any engineer who didn’t get their license and testified as an engineering expert witness must be suspect and is cheating the rules." Nutt became required to get a license when he began practicing engineering outside the "industrial exception".
- antiterra 5y agoI guess we disagree that making an argument backed up with engineering while clearly not misrepresenting himself is ‘practicing engineering.’ That argument, however, is somewhat covered by the proceedings of the Oregon case.