4 ms·
What's the point? He'll never beat LuaJIT. I'd rather see a new language with a "slow, slow, and slow" implementation that had interesting semantics than anothe
by toadstone 15y ago
What's the point? He'll never beat LuaJIT. I'd rather see a new language with a "slow, slow, and slow" implementation that had interesting semantics than another python/lua/js cut-down LISP.
- tjholowaychuk 15y agoThat's not a very good reason to ignore writing something you're interested in.