> So I need to read all ~30,000 pages of Zizek before forming an opinion. By all means, form an opinion that the man and his book and a half that you went thro

> So I need to read all ~30,000 pages of Zizek before forming an opinion. By all means, form an opinion that the man and his book and a half that you went through aren't for you, but I just think it's deeply anti-intellectual to discredit the entire collection of work he's put out. You're discrediting books that you likely don't have the requisite knowledge to review which is the problem that I take with it. > The fact that you (and he) would agree with that judgement doesn't make it any less damning. What's damning about it? I really don't get this part.