3 ms·
What's the name of this point? It's really hard to find any progress on this topic regarding Mochizuki other than some popular articles without any content.
by kungito 5y ago
What's the name of this point? It's really hard to find any progress on this topic regarding Mochizuki other than some popular articles without any content.
- deadbeef57 5y agoSee https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=10560 https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=10560, which links to a technical write-up by Scholze and Stix about what they think is the issue with Mochizuki's proof. Woit's blogpost also gives a bit more links, including a response by Mochizuki.
- bryan0 5y agoThe paper which everyone linked to when the discussion was going on now 404s, so here is a new link: https://ncatlab.org/nlab/files/why_abc_is_still_a_conjecture.pdf https://ncatlab.org/nlab/files/why_abc_is_still_a_conjecture... The point in the proof where scholze and stix show it fails is “IUTT-3, Corollary 3.12”