> the weather proofing they need out in the open He suggest to put one in the tower. There's no need to weather proof anything, or else poor controllers ;). In

> the weather proofing they need out in the open He suggest to put one in the tower. There's no need to weather proof anything, or else poor controllers ;). In theory the tower see the runways well enough, or else the airport isn't well designed and the tower doesn't fill its own purpose. > The dash cam used to record that video was standard, but also completely unable to handle even a well lit road at night. Weren't we still able to see the cyclist? Weren't we able to boost the contrast to see her even better? Sorry for the sarcasm, but even the worst camera show more than no camera at all... You can't argue that seeing a cyclist badly is worse than not seeing that same cyclist at all. All it takes is a 100$ camera and you would get so much more evidence.