4 ms·
You assume this wasn't done by the USA's military, like the anthrax attacks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_anthrax_attacks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001
by killerswan 15y ago
You assume this wasn't done by the USA's military, like the anthrax attacks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_anthrax_attacks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_anthrax_attacks
- sorbus 15y agoThere doesn't seem to be anything in that article that suggests that the military perpetrated the attacks. Would you care to explain further? EDIT: While a researcher with the US army was accused, there doesn't seem to be any evidence that he was actually responsible, and there is doubt over whether the anthrax he had access to was the parent of the spores used in the attack. Besides, even if he did it, saying that the US army is responsible for something implies high-level planning to do it. It's like saying, if someone in Anonymous works at McDonalds, and used a computer in one of their stores, that McDonalds is responsible for Anonymous's attacks.
- killerswan 15y agoThat is true, but you know that if a McDonalds employee used his fryer at work to do that, the headline and litigation would be about them, too. :P Regarding Anonymous, most of these cases will probably never be solved: there is probably far less evidence than the fragments the FBI had on Ivins or Hatfill. All I'm saying is that Anonymous could really be _anyone_.