3 ms·
A good point to make is that unlike most other professions, negligent -or downright dangerous- doctors are not naturally flushed out of the profession by market
by IG_Semmelweiss 5y ago
A good point to make is that unlike most other professions, negligent -or downright dangerous- doctors are not naturally flushed out of the profession by market mechanisms that keep other professions in check.
As documented by Marty Makari's book "Unaccountable", state boards rarely if ever sanction doctors for negligence. First, bad doctors are protected by a code of omerta from public exposure [1]. This is often because the bad doctors are the ones that deal with the awful hours / patients / cases, no one else wishes to deal with.
In the rare instance sanctions happen, they simply go to another state and continue to practice [2]
Therefore, you are far more likely to end up with an incompetent doctor... than you would like to think.
[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390444709004577652201640230514 https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390444709004577652...
[2] https://www.baltimoresun.com/citypaper/bcp-cms-1-1378603-migrated-story-cp-20120926-featu-20120926-story.html https://www.baltimoresun.com/citypaper/bcp-cms-1-1378603-mig...
- renewiltord 5y agoNotably someone as incredibly malignantly incompetent as Christopher Duntsch worked for two years after his first horrible work was discovered. These people are protected in their incompetence. For generations we’ve been told that regulation will help. It hasn’t. Suing post facto hasn’t. It’s time to try something else. It’s time to try deregulation and market factors.