3 ms·
Well, take the second link for example: https://austingwalters.com/covid19-vaccine-risks/ https://austingwalters.com/covid19-vaccine-risks/ 1) The chart shown
by spamizbad 5y ago
Well, take the second link for example: https://austingwalters.com/covid19-vaccine-risks/ https://austingwalters.com/covid19-vaccine-risks/
1) The chart shown mixes up lipid concentrations for protein spikes from the original cited paper and data
2) R00-R99 coded deaths will always be higher for "new" data. Over time, these are revised and coded differently. So if you look backwards from today, it will always seem like this number has gone way up the last month or so. The author notes this in his post (good), but leaves the original one in its place (also fine, but just be aware).
The author's hypothesis is not supported by data, and the arguments put forth are based on misunderstanding or misinterpreting things.
Also if the fear here is the mRNA vaccines are dangerous, there's always the more traditional Janssen (J&J) vaccine which does not use mRNA.
- spadez 5y agoThis page seem to be updated https://austingwalters.com/covid19-vaccine-risks/ https://austingwalters.com/covid19-vaccine-risks/ with the information about observation of increase in R00-R99 deaths for current time. But the article does not appear to believe that it changes their reading of the data.