> At no point in time does Kelly give you more wealth with probability 1, Either you're claiming that the theorem I attempted to describe is false, or you're m

> At no point in time does Kelly give you more wealth with probability 1, Either you're claiming that the theorem I attempted to describe is false, or you're misunderstanding the theorem I am trying to describe. I never wrote anything about 'high probability' either so I don't know why you introduced that notion.