>Are you saying guns are not out of control, or guns being out of control is not an issue? Guns are inanimate objects and thus are not capable of being out of

>Are you saying guns are not out of control, or guns being out of control is not an issue? Guns are inanimate objects and thus are not capable of being out of control. >Also, if you were to substitute "nukes" or "ebola vials" for "guns" in your argument, would it still stand? Yes, no, and yes. Ebola is a living thing that can act independently once released. Even a nuke either explodes or doesn't. The issue I'm trying to raise is not so much about guns, but the propaganda phrase used to promote citizen disarmament. The subject is accurately described as citizen disarmament, because of the exceptions included in every second amendment infringing law. They invariably exempt authority from the restrictions when the second amendment explicitly prohibits exactly this. If every law they passed an tried to pass applied also to the military, police, and retired police then it would actually be "gun regulation". But it never does, so it is is not firearms regulation, but citizen (and only citizen) disarmament.