3 ms·
Maybe I'm missing something, but it has a large population and is physically larger, thus it is less significant?
by ultrarunner 5y ago
Maybe I'm missing something, but it has a large population and is physically larger, thus it is less significant?
- maccam94 5y agoSprawl isn't really a positive indicator. Cities exist to support their population and economic activity, not cover land.
- ultrarunner 5y agoThat doesn't explain why it's less significant. It is a large cohesive city with elements of consistency, including its own culture. I have friends on the extreme east and west of the city. Less density is the result of insane central planning that resulted poorly, although predictably. That doesn't make it any less of a place.