3 ms·
> free labor though is it really labor if someone is doing it as a hobby. Its not free if they are getting enjoyment out of it.
by dominotw 5y ago
> free labor though
is it really labor if someone is doing it as a hobby. Its not free if they are getting enjoyment out of it.
- sam0x17 5y agoIf you could have paid someone to do it, it is labor.
- wtetzner 5y agoUnder that definition, I can’t really think of any activity that isn’t labor.
- sidlls 5y agoIf one is engaged in an activity that is typically compensated (e.g. software development for others' use), then it's not a hobby. It's unpaid labor.
- dominotw 5y ago> then it's not a hobby. Its not upto you to decide what constitutes a hobby though. Person doing it can decide for himself if they see it as a hobby.
- sidlls 5y agoIt doesn't work like that: the individual is engaged in an activity in a society, not on an island alone. If an activity would typically be considered a work for compensation by society's norms, it's not reasonable to call it a hobby. A person can write software as a hobby (personal use, or maybe use personally/within a small circle of friends) and, at the same time, write software for use by others in commercial endeavors (work). The fact that they may not do the latter in exchange for money doesn't make it a hobby.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- dominotw 5y ago> If an activity would typically be considered a work for compensation by society's norms, it's not reasonable to call it a hobby. woodworking in my garage can't be called my hobby because most woodworkers get paid for it?