3 ms·
Most of the article is in fact factually incorrect. The main thesis is that: Brave's adblocker is just uBlock Origin and so it's better to just use uBlock Orig
by fastball 5y ago
Most of the article is in fact factually incorrect.
The main thesis is that: Brave's adblocker is just uBlock Origin and so it's better to just use uBlock Origin on FF.
But Brave's adblocker is not just uBlock Origin so the entire article falls apart.
Everything else is just trying to misrepresent everything in the worst possible light.
> It is said that this might be a backdoor. But I don’t want to get conspiracist. I prefer giving you verifiable facts. I’ll limit myself to inform you about suspicious activities.
Righttt... we're not children, we all know what you're trying to do here.
- rchaud 5y agoOn mobile, it's not as easy to say "use FF Android". Desktop FF is fine, and it's what I use, but on mobile FF is not as fast as Chromium based browsers. Text-heavy content is fine everywhere, but for sites that are more interactive, Chromium based browsers usually deliver less choppy performance.