4 ms·
Still no any sane official library to support GUI in .NET CORE...
by hansor 5y ago
Still no any sane official library to support GUI in .NET CORE...
- AbuAssar 5y agoDid you try uno?
- aspaviento 5y agoThey are working on MAUI https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/maui/what-is-maui https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/maui/what-is-maui
- SideburnsOfDoom 5y agoMAUI (.NET Multi-platform App UI) is the new thing in cross platform UIs. https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/introducing-net-multi-platform-app-ui/ https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/introducing-net-multi-... Unfortunately I don't know much about it yet, it's not my area. Is it not sane?
- MeinBlutIstBlau 5y agoI've never heard of it but I'll keep it on my radar. I love the idea of having a universal GUI using C#. I haven't done much android development, but I only know that it would be a tad less tedious if I didn't have to deal with android studio.
- oaiey 5y agoMaui is Xamarin.Forms. It is undergoing renovation to compete with React Native, Flutter and the self rendered stacks.
- egeozcan 5y agoHave a look at this: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/maui/ https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/maui/ Example: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/introducing-net-multi-platform-app-ui/#mvu https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/introducing-net-multi-...
- Felk 5y agoNot official, but I have had good experiences with AvaloniaUI, which sticks very close to WPF and is part of the .NET foundation umbrella. It inherits quite a lot of what made WPF mature and robust
- slownews45 5y agoThis was my question - anything like even windows Forms (which was a super easy way to get little apps together). Microsoft went crazy with their GUI approaches for a while - just straight insanity for little purpose that I could see.
- WorldMaker 5y ago.NET 5 supports WinForms and WPF, just Windows only.
- slownews45 5y agoFantastic - I could never get the designer working right but after all the whiplash of microsofts UI approaches I've moved away so have no current experience. Good to hear its supported.
- WorldMaker 5y agoI find "whiplash" comments interesting. Microsoft has been relatively consistent since Vista, everything post-Vista XAML based. Some of the runtimes (which .NET versions are supported, what if any other languages are supported) and brands have shifted every five years or so, but there are lines of consistency from start to finish, and upgrade paths at nearly every stage, and XAML is generally XAML throughout. Things have generally been well supported for good maintenance lifetimes at each stage. (With the shortest probably being Silverlight, and its extended security support hasn't even expired yet, even if no one should have built new apps against it in at least five or six years now and no modern browser has supported running them.) Compared to Win32 not changing much since roughly 1995 or so, it's wild and constantly shifting, but compared to say JS frontend frameworks it's more stable than a lot of things people are doing in UI.
- fuzzy2 5y agoWhat's wrong with WPF or WinForms? It's not cross-platform, of course. Or is that not sane enough? :-D
- wiso 5y agohttp://avaloniaui.net/ http://avaloniaui.net/