3 ms·
The .doc is actually a more widely readable format. Why care how hackable a document format is if all you want to do is view and edit it?
by aston 18y ago
The .doc is actually a more widely readable format. Why care how hackable a document format is if all you want to do is view and edit it?
- apgwoz 18y agoIt's been a while since I've used a .doc on my personal computer, but when I do, I use Open Office. It's never understood .docs perfectly and has always been a pain to send back and forth to people. Now, I think I remember reading something about Microsoft "opening" it's formats, so maybe this is a non-issue these days? Even still, in the more general case, the idea that a file format is locked up and has to be reverse engineered for some people to view/edit it always presents at least some problems for someone. Supporting open formats, while perhaps not as widely used right now, at least is a step in the right direction. Maybe Joe Hacker, whose been using MS Office all his life, gets curious when he sees a .odt. Maybe he looks it up and sees that he'd rather be apart of a movement to free the world of non-open/proprietary office file formats and makes a vow to only create documents in a free format like OpenDocument (and convert .docs to .odt). Maybe he tells all his friends and the demand for OpenDocument is increased. Oh, and I hear Microsoft is supporting OpenDocument these days (at least via a plugin).