4 ms·
Yes, but I have a suspicion the rights holder in this case is the label and not the composer/performer.
by StavrosK 5y ago
Yes, but I have a suspicion the rights holder in this case is the label and not the composer/performer.
- voisin 5y agoThat’s almost certainly the case, and something the composer/performer signed up for as part of the deal. So what’s the conflict with someone who owns rights to some thing allowing someone else to do things with that thing? It just feels like a massive stretch to act like these poor performers are being taken advantage of with Atmos remixing.