5 ms·
It's almost 2% of the users Facebook has.
by melvinng 15y ago
It's almost 2% of the users Facebook has.
- AndrewDucker 15y agoIn two weeks.
- bonch 15y agoBuzz also gained millions of users in a short period of time.
- badclient 15y agoAnd engagement? All I know is in early days of fb I remember vast majority of people in large lecture halls being glued to fb. I don't see remotely that type o of engagement with g+.
- afterburner 15y agoFacebook was most peoples' introduction to social sites, that accounted for a lot of the simultaneous fascination. I don't see it as a strike against Google+ that it won't achieve the same encounter with novelty.
- mkr-hn 15y agohttps://plus.google.com/u/0/101307099794854494980/posts/2iRZxAaRbv7 https://plus.google.com/u/0/101307099794854494980/posts/2iRZ...
- eavc 15y agoIn the early days of FB, the users were all horny college kids. Of course they were glued to what was essentially an online cocktail party.
- jlouis 15y agoThat is not the question to ask. The question is to ask about the amount of users that have been active in the last week or month. The user count doesn't really matter. Any new technology has to start with 0 users and grow from there. You could have used the same argument - but just use Myspace and Facebook rather than Facebook and Google+. In other words, I don't think it matters.