> Two, companies aren't going to want to work with a firm that's allowing engineers to collect detailed information on douchey behaviour that the company might

> Two, companies aren't going to want to work with a firm that's allowing engineers to collect detailed information on douchey behaviour that the company might engage in. On the other hand, if a company does not engage in douchey behaviour, then using Triplebyte could be a way to signal that. This fails a bit if companies can be credibly accused of douchey behaviour when they haven't been engaged in it. I don't know what Triplebyte's plan is here. > Does Triplebyte have the leverage and moxie to make them engage anyway? Probably not, see point one. Indeed. They labour the point that programmers have the upper hand in hiring, but that doesn't translate to Triplebyte having the upper hand!