3 ms·
Why? Is it okay for the automated system to make objectively bad decisions until it reaches the magic threshold of however many incidents the non-automated syst
by stefan_ 5y ago
Why? Is it okay for the automated system to make objectively bad decisions until it reaches the magic threshold of however many incidents the non-automated system had? In a rewrite, do we not look at bugs until they exceed the number of the original system?
- WanderPanda 5y agoI don't get this radical zero-covid-like mentality. At unbounded cost we can diminish all risk. How do people get to this radical/dystopian point of view that no trade-off should exist?
- stefan_ 5y agoThe point is that you are deliberately misinterpreting the original article and then trying to turn that stupidity into silencing the problem entirely. The original article doesn't relate this to other statistics at all, that was a fabrication of the grandparent. Of course NHTSA needs to investigate each and every one of these crashes. These are automated systems failing and so the issue could be systemic. It's the same reason every rail or airplane crash is investigated.