3 ms·
The downsides sound a bit odd. The process as usually described seems like a single person usually writes the doc, often the person in charge of delivering the
by sudhirj 5y ago
The downsides sound a bit odd. The process as usually described seems like a single person usually writes the doc, often the person in charge of delivering the project? Why would there be much argument about the wording then? And if there is a duo or team, it sounds like the same rules as pull request / code reviews apply? Make sure it's objectively correct, then concise, and last stylish?
- glenngillen 5y agoIt varies on the attendees in the meeting and the length of the document. If it’s what is typically referred to as a “6 pager” the situation that parent outlined is certainly believable. Lots of collaboration with peers and your manager and weeks of refinement before that meeting. Similar with the working backward process/PRFAQ. You might stop shopping it around when it’s just the answer to the 5 questions and an aspirational testimonial. By the time it’s a meeting reviewing the 1-2 page press release it’s likely been months of refinement. That isn’t to say it’s a full time effort over that period though. These things are usually background/parallel work with whatever else you you’re doing.