2 ms·
I rather like "make". Far preferable to "ant", IMHO. Some make features are perhaps a bit obscure, but the basic structure of: output.file: input.1 input
by Roboprog 15y ago
I rather like "make". Far preferable to "ant", IMHO.
Some make features are perhaps a bit obscure, but the basic structure of:
output.file: input.1 input.2
build_it input.* -o output.file
is quite straightforward.
- roel_v 15y agoOK I'll concede that make on its own in its most basic form isn't all that bad (although it's not hard to make anything look good by comparing it with Ant); it's the autotools toolchain that makes it such a jungle. Which is, strictly speaking, separate from make, and is what I was mostly agitating against.