4 ms·

In the video is says that dyslexic readers made fewer errors when reading the text than normal readers, and they think that means that it helps dyslexics read e

In the video is says that dyslexic readers made fewer errors when reading the text than normal readers, and they think that means that it helps dyslexics read easier. What kind of experiment is that? If you want to know if it helps dyslexics, you don't change out the dyslexics... You change out the font! It sounds like they either don't understand experimentation at all, or they borrowed someone else's results and tried to read things into them. Edit: As noted below, they apparently actually did test whether dyslexics could read that font better or not. They just also happened to test normal people as well, to see if they were affected. The video confuses this.

starwed 15y ago
The video contained a lot of weird phrasings, probably due to translation... I'd assume that this is more of that.
Fester 15y ago
Well, it is a nice solution to make someone's life easier when there are no signs of a cure coming. For example, this font could be set up as a system's default (or even it could be enforced as the 'one and only' typeface) and thus it will make dyslexic's life better. IMO it's a win. Also you should note, that this font was created by a dyslexic, so I think he knows what he is doing.
- wccrawford 15y ago
  He probably knows how to help himself, but that doesn't necessarily mean he knows how to help others. However, I did find some ideas that I thought might be helpful. In particular, making each letter bottom-heavy and making each letter different than other letters, so that if you rotate them, they aren't identical. Sadly, it appears that either doesn't work, or he didn't make drastic enough changes. I actually like the look of the font, though, when it's large enough.
  - Fester 15y ago
    Just to clarify: your confidence in how dyslexic letter recognition works makes me think that you are a dyslexic, aren't you?
rgjvanderdussen 15y ago
According to the master's thesis there are no significant main effects: http://www.ilo.gw.utwente.nl/ilo/attachments/032_Masterthesis_Leeuw.pdf http://www.ilo.gw.utwente.nl/ilo/attachments/032_Masterthesi... I could imagine that this works well for specific kinds of dyslexia.
- gus_massa 15y ago
  I agree. I read the tables in the thesis. There are 12 comparations between the Arial and the Dyslexie fonts, but only 2 of then have p<.1 and none of them has p<.05. So it is very difficult to know if the differences between the fonts are real or come from random noise. They made a font that they think is better for people with dyslexia, they tried it, but they found almost no difference. This work is only a master thesis, so perhaps they are planning to continue working on this. But for now it is not a "cure" for dyslexia. --- I think that the problem is that they didn’t do enough "beta"-testing. (Perhaps they did it, but it is not in the thesis.) With infinity time, money and resources, they should: * Find a small group people with dyslexia. * Do some A/B testing on them for one year. Compare two fonts with very little difference. For example in one font the dot of the i has the normal size and in the other font the dot is bigger. * Perhaps, from time to time, change the group of people, to be sure that the font is good for "normal" people with dyslexia, not only for the trained group that is in the laboratory. * Perhaps, from time to time, try some bigger changes, but measure the improvement. * Find a new bigger group people with dyslexia. * Compare with this people the difference between the original and the final font.
- lloeki 15y ago
  The approach is weird because it focuses on shapes: "many of the letters look similar – such as v/w, i/j and m/n – thus people with dyslexia often confuse these letters" Dyslexic people usually don't confuse letters M and N, they confuse M and P. Notice how they don't relate in any sort of way. This shows how much of a brainfuck (no offense) it is to live with dyslexia, and how hard it is for non-dyslexic to understand the disability. To make an object-oriented parallel, dyslexic people know very well the difference between two classes (concepts), but when seeing or creating instances (realisation), they can't seem to make heads or tails of which one belongs to which class. So the instances m of class M and p of class P will get processed as some mashup M/P. The only way out is to work around the mashup by tying M class and P class each to another unrelated concept, but related to the instances. So as an example, the letter 'm' is linked to the word 'marmalade' (which is an instance of the concept of 'Marmalade') and p to the word peanut (itself an instance of Peanut). 'Marmalade' and 'Peanut' being hopefully[0] unrelated, the person can find a solution by linking concepts (not instances) 'M' to 'Marmalade' and 'P' to 'Peanut', so that when the person tries to process the word 'motor', instead of being faced with a dreadful (M/P).O.T.O.R. they will be able work around the issue by thinking (Marmalade).O.T.O.R. I took the 'm' shape which is present in both 'marmalade' and 'motor' as a link vector, but really any vector will do, and people use an extremely diverse array of vectors and associations. One can end up linking 'm' to 'Green' just because for some reason seeing a 'm' makes him thing of the color (hence concept) 'Green' whereas 'p' will be tied to 'Red'. Being able to break the M/P mashup is the key, and whatever association will do, so it just happens that M/P+Green == M for someone. [0] I said 'hopefully', because concepts of any level can result in a mashup. If for some reason the mashup Marmalade/Peanut exists, it will be of no help to map m to Marmalade.
skrebbel 15y ago
Please blame the messenger. See http://www.ilo.gw.utwente.nl/ilo/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=32:master-thesis-leeuw&catid=9:theses&Itemid=4 http://www.ilo.gw.utwente.nl/ilo/index.php?option=com_conten... for the M.Sc. thesis' conclusions. Notably: Students read the reading tests EMT and Klepel twice. Once printed in the font Arial and once in the font “Dyslexie”. The order was randomly assigned and in-between the reading tests an auditory task was fulfilled. Thus, the study measured whether Dyslexie reads better than Arial. Maybe Georgia reads even better.

starwed 15y ago

The video contained a lot of weird phrasings, probably due to translation... I'd assume that this is more of that.

Fester 15y ago

Well, it is a nice solution to make someone's life easier when there are no signs of a cure coming. For example, this font could be set up as a system's default (or even it could be enforced as the 'one and only' typeface) and thus it will make dyslexic's life better. IMO it's a win. Also you should note, that this font was created by a dyslexic, so I think he knows what he is doing.

wccrawford 15y ago
He probably knows how to help himself, but that doesn't necessarily mean he knows how to help others. However, I did find some ideas that I thought might be helpful. In particular, making each letter bottom-heavy and making each letter different than other letters, so that if you rotate them, they aren't identical. Sadly, it appears that either doesn't work, or he didn't make drastic enough changes. I actually like the look of the font, though, when it's large enough.
- Fester 15y ago
  Just to clarify: your confidence in how dyslexic letter recognition works makes me think that you are a dyslexic, aren't you?

rgjvanderdussen 15y ago

According to the master's thesis there are no significant main effects: http://www.ilo.gw.utwente.nl/ilo/attachments/032_Masterthesis_Leeuw.pdf http://www.ilo.gw.utwente.nl/ilo/attachments/032_Masterthesi... I could imagine that this works well for specific kinds of dyslexia.

gus_massa 15y ago
I agree. I read the tables in the thesis. There are 12 comparations between the Arial and the Dyslexie fonts, but only 2 of then have p<.1 and none of them has p<.05. So it is very difficult to know if the differences between the fonts are real or come from random noise. They made a font that they think is better for people with dyslexia, they tried it, but they found almost no difference. This work is only a master thesis, so perhaps they are planning to continue working on this. But for now it is not a "cure" for dyslexia. --- I think that the problem is that they didn’t do enough "beta"-testing. (Perhaps they did it, but it is not in the thesis.) With infinity time, money and resources, they should: * Find a small group people with dyslexia. * Do some A/B testing on them for one year. Compare two fonts with very little difference. For example in one font the dot of the i has the normal size and in the other font the dot is bigger. * Perhaps, from time to time, change the group of people, to be sure that the font is good for "normal" people with dyslexia, not only for the trained group that is in the laboratory. * Perhaps, from time to time, try some bigger changes, but measure the improvement. * Find a new bigger group people with dyslexia. * Compare with this people the difference between the original and the final font.
lloeki 15y ago
The approach is weird because it focuses on shapes: "many of the letters look similar – such as v/w, i/j and m/n – thus people with dyslexia often confuse these letters" Dyslexic people usually don't confuse letters M and N, they confuse M and P. Notice how they don't relate in any sort of way. This shows how much of a brainfuck (no offense) it is to live with dyslexia, and how hard it is for non-dyslexic to understand the disability. To make an object-oriented parallel, dyslexic people know very well the difference between two classes (concepts), but when seeing or creating instances (realisation), they can't seem to make heads or tails of which one belongs to which class. So the instances m of class M and p of class P will get processed as some mashup M/P. The only way out is to work around the mashup by tying M class and P class each to another unrelated concept, but related to the instances. So as an example, the letter 'm' is linked to the word 'marmalade' (which is an instance of the concept of 'Marmalade') and p to the word peanut (itself an instance of Peanut). 'Marmalade' and 'Peanut' being hopefully[0] unrelated, the person can find a solution by linking concepts (not instances) 'M' to 'Marmalade' and 'P' to 'Peanut', so that when the person tries to process the word 'motor', instead of being faced with a dreadful (M/P).O.T.O.R. they will be able work around the issue by thinking (Marmalade).O.T.O.R. I took the 'm' shape which is present in both 'marmalade' and 'motor' as a link vector, but really any vector will do, and people use an extremely diverse array of vectors and associations. One can end up linking 'm' to 'Green' just because for some reason seeing a 'm' makes him thing of the color (hence concept) 'Green' whereas 'p' will be tied to 'Red'. Being able to break the M/P mashup is the key, and whatever association will do, so it just happens that M/P+Green == M for someone. [0] I said 'hopefully', because concepts of any level can result in a mashup. If for some reason the mashup Marmalade/Peanut exists, it will be of no help to map m to Marmalade.

skrebbel 15y ago

Please blame the messenger. See http://www.ilo.gw.utwente.nl/ilo/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=32:master-thesis-leeuw&catid=9:theses&Itemid=4 http://www.ilo.gw.utwente.nl/ilo/index.php?option=com_conten... for the M.Sc. thesis' conclusions. Notably: Students read the reading tests EMT and Klepel twice. Once printed in the font Arial and once in the font “Dyslexie”. The order was randomly assigned and in-between the reading tests an auditory task was fulfilled. Thus, the study measured whether Dyslexie reads better than Arial. Maybe Georgia reads even better.