2 ms·
> But Ars is taking evidence of votes on the budget as a whole, and trying to make them say that Republicans are against municipal broadband. If you voted for
by shkkmo 5y ago
> But Ars is taking evidence of votes on the budget as a whole, and trying to make them say that Republicans are against municipal broadband.
If you voted for a bill containing a specific provision, it is entirely reasonable to supose that you support that provision, especially when you don't make a public protestation against the inclusion of that provision.
The counter claim is not as reasonable. Just because you vote against a bill containing a provision, that doesn't mean it is reasonable to supoose you oppose that provision (at leat without additional context.)
> What we need are the voting records on the amendment that added this stupid ban to the budget.
That would might give us additional information on who takes a strong stance against municipal broadband (or possibly who got their palms greased.)
- AnimalMuppet 5y ago> If you voted for a bill containing a specific provision, it is entirely reasonable to supose that you support that provision... No, that's not reasonable. You support the bill as a whole, not every sentence in it. The strongest that can be said is that you don't disagree with that provision strongly enough to reject the whole bill over it.
- shkkmo 5y agoIt's not definitive proof, but without any statements against the provision, it is a reasonable conclusion to draw.