2 ms·
> for what it's worth, one of them mellowed out after their editorial assistant committed suicide Maybe it's just me, but I don't think "used to be super-toxic
by vanderZwan 5y ago
> for what it's worth, one of them mellowed out after their editorial assistant committed suicide
Maybe it's just me, but I don't think "used to be super-toxic but once they tormented someone into suicide they got better" is worth shit.
- serf 5y agoso then no real reason for the terrible person to improve? Now that they've goaded someone into a suicide they're unforgivable, regardless of their remorse/regret/introspective consideration? i'd rather live in a society that gives bad people a motivation to improve, rather than one that condemns all people who commit bad actions as tainted forever by their previous regretted action. a terrible person who has improved through introspection and societal nudging into a decent human being is society's trophy for a job well done. It's exactly the desired outcome; to continue to condemn the apologetic and rehabilitated individual is useful for nothing except for petty vengeance between the victim's social network and the perpetrating individual - it serves little to no societal good.