It's typical factless nonsense that is so vague it becomes meaningless. Midway through the article, it tries to present one fact: "In practice, that might look

It's typical factless nonsense that is so vague it becomes meaningless. Midway through the article, it tries to present one fact: "In practice, that might look something like the post below, which was shared in a QAnon Telegram group." To get context, we need to know which group so we could verify the post for ourselves and also the number of views of the post and the number of members of the group which would reveal how relevant or extensive this theory has spread.