4 ms·
"2. it would be difficult for it to become as popular as facebook because there are alreasy [sic] lots of social graphs in facebook already established." A few
by knieveltech 15y ago
"2. it would be difficult for it to become as popular as facebook because there are alreasy [sic] lots of social graphs in facebook already established."
A few points to consider:
1. I'm not an early adopter, of anything, ever.
2. I've managed to mirror 100% of the Facebook contacts I give a shit about in Google+ in less than 24 hours, with substantially improved organization & compartmentalization, not to mention a noticeable lack of ads or Zynga spam.
3. A full third of my FB contacts have requested a G+ invite as soon as they heard I was already in.
4. All of the people I've invited or otherwise added to my circles are active in their G+ accounts.
- jamesbkel 15y agoMostly agreed (just speaking for myself) on your #1. Could not agree more on #2-4. Still, I'm a bit uncertain how Circles will pan out once G+ gains traction, but it's without a doubt more manageable than FB.
- cesar 15y agoSorry for the typo. I like G+. And I agree with your #2 and #3. Maybe am seeing it the wrong way. Maybe there will be a time when there will be two or more big social networks. And you will have to use all of them. I can see how G+ could become part of the Google services. Enhancing what you already do with the google services. But still, I just don't see G+ being a Facebook killer.
- dannyr 15y agoG+ doesn't need to kill Facebook to be successful.