3 ms·

The lab leak hypothesis is plausible because accidents happen. I should know

• 908B64B197 5y ago
  Interesting how media coverage completely changed. Under the previous administration it was considered racist to even mention the theory and it's proponents were considered racists or conspiracy theorists. Why such a sudden change? China certainly didn't change its position on the issue...
  • bigphishy 5y ago
    Far be it for me to get sucked into politics, but I think the difference here can be explained that more evidence came out. It is only now becoming clear exactly how detrimental, and for how long the CCP has been obstructing investigations. The more time that passes, the more clear it is that there is some obstructionism, and that makes the CCP look guilty. I don't think either US political party said that no further scrutiny should be applied. Everyone wanted more investigation. I also think that we should focus on the issue. If you want to make another issue about bias in the mainstream media, that's a much larger can of worms, and I definitely support that and agree with you.
  • sascha_sl 5y ago
    Don’t be disingenuous, the change was anything but sudden. There still is no hard evidence for either the intermediate host nor the lab leak theories, intermediate host just seemed more plausible before a year was spent not proving it (and at this point the virus might have moved on). So yes, the lab leak was largely unfounded and weaponised by racists who wanted to get their “china virus!!!” fix. Who, by the way, also kept implying that this was not accidental.