Contract violations or fraud or whatever this was aren’t the same kind of crime as taking somebody’s property. This is a semantic dodge. It is widely acknowle

Contract violations or fraud or whatever this was aren’t the same kind of crime as taking somebody’s property. This is a semantic dodge. It is widely acknowledged that fraudulent misappropriation of wages is a form of stealing; there's even a name for it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wage_theft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wage_theft Also, Amazon's violation was orders of magnitude greater in scale (and enacted against victims who were individually more vulnerable) than, say, Ewing's alleged violation. Ewing was a serial burglar and robber who refused to stop stealing stuff. Bezos is also a serial violator who can't stealing in all sorts of other ways (tax avoidance, pushing counterfeit products, etc), also at ginormous scale. Kalief Browder was charged with robbery and assault and had bail set at $3000, and would have gotten out, only he was on probation. There's no way you can talk down the harm that was done to Kalief Browder. The consensus among everyone involved was that he was wrongly incarcerated (even given the circumstances you've described) and severely mistreated (beaten -and- sentenced to 23 hour shifts of solitary confinement). Even the City tacitly agrees - that's why they agreed to the $3.3 million civil finding. (Oh and the charges against Browder turned out to be quite flimsy, btw, and were most likely spurious all along). Ewing is a textbook example of the kind of guy who belongs in jail. The point isn't that Ewing doesn't belong in jail - but that Bezos clearly does, by this point.