2 ms·

I don’t know why you have a problem with one 20-something managing a ton of people because the market rewarded his idea while you have a problem with a differen

I don’t know why you have a problem with one 20-something managing a ton of people because the market rewarded his idea while you have a problem with a different 30-something managing a ton of people. To argue that young founders that run big companies are capable while questioning if young bureaucrats are is purely ageist.

ceilingcorner 5y ago
This line of reasoning makes no sense. A founder CEO is there because it’s his/her company. They built it up, they grew the company and grew with it. That’s how a business works. This is not the same thing as a person with little or no managerial experience being appointed to one of the the highest offices available. Your comparison would make sense if young businesspeople with little experience were made CEOs at blue chip companies. This obviously doesn’t happen very often.