3 ms·
To be fair, no one was using statistics and the scientific method to support bloodletting, or miasma theory.
by ch4s3 5y ago
To be fair, no one was using statistics and the scientific method to support bloodletting, or miasma theory.
- Karrot_Kream 5y agoNo, but let's not forget that much of statistics was originally invented to provide a rigorous underpinning for eugenics. Pearson, who invented many of the most commonly used statistical results, was a prominent eugenicist and contributed greatly to its ideas.
- ch4s3 5y agoThat doesn't mean that statistics aren't a useful tool for checking the strength of evidence, or building a case for a hypothesis.
- Karrot_Kream 5y agoSure, but it doesn't change the fact that your findings will be as useful or useless as your premise. If you're trying to use statsitics to prove pseudoscience, well, it's still pseudoscience at the end of the day. (NB: I don't mean that psychological sciences are pseudoscience.)