3 ms·
In two years, people will still be saying "nginx + ssl = bad" because of this post even though the problem may well be fully addressed. Google will continue to
by whirlycott1 15y ago
In two years, people will still be saying "nginx + ssl = bad" because of this post even though the problem may well be fully addressed. Google will continue to surface this article even though it may be totally wrong at some future date. That sucks.
- vog 15y agoIf it was really that easy to spread this questionable message for years, it would be as easy to spread other articles as well. So it wouldn't need more than a few articles, like "nginx + ssl = works like a charm", or "nginx has better SSL support than Apache". It would not matter whether those were actually correct, just a single article of questionable quality would be sufficient.
- vog 15y ago... and here it is: "nginx does not suck at ssl" http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2759596 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2759596