I don't think so. Even if that were true, he knows is power and influence and how it works with sponsorship etc.. So he would have known it would have been int

I don't think so. Even if that were true, he knows is power and influence and how it works with sponsorship etc.. So he would have known it would have been interpreted one way and not the other. Definitely moving a bottle of something aside he's not being paid for is rational in his part. If he 'said the names' of the water companies he was not sponsored by, that would be odd as he knows not to do that, but if he just said 'water' then that would be normal.