3 ms·
Wow, that's an awful design. It's even harder to implement that than to leave it stateless and require the client to pass in a date range.
by justin_oaks 5y ago
Wow, that's an awful design. It's even harder to implement that than to leave it stateless and require the client to pass in a date range.
- slver 5y agoThink about it like a message queue. You can't keep things stateless and serve old data forever, or you have a queue that grows forever. What you can do however is have an explicit "ack" for data being received and stored, before it's discarded. And apparently that API didn't.