5 ms·
Right, because information is best delivered in the service of the Rich and Powerful. Journalists™ and Journ-o-lists are the best form of right-think and certif
by the_optimist 5y ago
Right, because information is best delivered in the service of the Rich and Powerful. Journalists™ and Journ-o-lists are the best form of right-think and certified information.
- MisterBastahrd 5y agoEven great journalists have editors for a reason.
- the_optimist 5y agoGot it. We need properly-placed editors to govern the flow of information, to ensure the well-being of the Rich and Powerful.
- MisterBastahrd 5y agoNo, we need editors so half-cocked idiots don't ruin the credibility of their entire organization.
- the_optimist 5y agoUnderstood. Credibility derives from whether or not the people who receive information like it or not.
- MisterBastahrd 5y agoNo, but I can understand how someone committed to being an ideologue might pretend to think that. Just turn your brain off and pretend you're carrying that cross.
- squabble 5y agoThat's pretty mean for hacker news. I think you've broken the rules. I've noticed a pattern that attacks against Assange supporters are tolerated here.
- MisterBastahrd 5y agoTotally. Because having a negative opinion of Assange due to his rhetoric, behavior, and hypocrisy is simply showered with positivity here. So enjoyable to have people talk past you in an insulting manner because they hate addressing your points directly.
- the_optimist 5y agoI stand behind this dialogue as testament to the full strength of your argument and the quality of your logic.