5 ms·
At the time 40 bits was not considered a backdoor, it was considered a weakness that would allow folks like NSA (with big budgets and intercept capabilities) to
by slownews45 5y ago
At the time 40 bits was not considered a backdoor, it was considered a weakness that would allow folks like NSA (with big budgets and intercept capabilities) to wiretap the way they had other communication approaches.
Some situations, rather than designing new codecs, they would just weaken key gen side. The IBM effort there was public to allow for easier export, but also an approach that could be used to hide the weakness which in other settings may have been beneficial. It's possible however that folks involved understood what was going on to a degree but that it was seen as necessary to avoid export / import restrictions.
More recently I think places like China ask that the holders of key material be located in country and make the full keys available or accessible to their security services. Not sure how AWS squares that circle unless they outsource their data centers in China to a third party that can then expose the keys for China to use.
- gnfargbl 5y ago> Not sure how AWS squares that circle unless they outsource their data centers in China to a third party that can then expose the keys for China to use. If you check something like the Public Suffix List [1], you will notice that Amazon maintains separate com.cn domains for several of its services in China. Amazon doesn't appear to do that for any other country. It follows that AWS in China might well be isolated from AWS elsewhere. [1] https://publicsuffix.org/list/public_suffix_list.dat https://publicsuffix.org/list/public_suffix_list.dat
- xyzzy123 5y agoAWS KMS is a regional service but China is still extra special. With KMS actually the only thing that prevents encrypt/decrypt from anywhere on the Internet is the access control logic of the service. AWS of course hold the private keys for ACM certs too and could provide them upon request. (Side note: the KMS "BYOK" functionality is almost completely useless). Realistically you should expect any cloud-hosted infrastructure to be fully transparent to relevant authorities. This is usually not a business problem.
- pugz 5y ago> Not sure how AWS squares that circle unless they outsource their data centers in China to a third party that can then expose the keys for China to use. This is in fact precisely what they do. The Beijing region is operated by Sinnet and the Ningxia region is operated by NWCD. It's documented here: https://www.amazonaws.cn/en/about-aws/china/ https://www.amazonaws.cn/en/about-aws/china/