3 ms·
Most of the time is spent rendering the page. Maybe, but it's the client spending that time, not the server. It's largely a separate issue from what it is bein
by sciurus 15y ago
Most of the time is spent rendering the page.
Maybe, but it's the client spending that time, not the server. It's largely a separate issue from what it is being discussed here.
Save the most user-time per engineering hour you can.
If your server can handle 100 requests a second and you know you're soon going to be receiving 1000 requests per second, it makes more sense to address that with HTTP caching than twiddle with your javascript includes. A browser can't render a page that the server is too overloaded to send.
- jacques_chester 15y agoIf you're serving the javascript yourself, then combining 3 javascripts into a single file might drop your RPS from 1000 to 500. Maybe worth a quick twiddle.