As soon as I saw "...be it in child exploitation..." I skipped the entire content in parenthesis. Whoever said that was not attempting to provide a logical arg

As soon as I saw "...be it in child exploitation..." I skipped the entire content in parenthesis. Whoever said that was not attempting to provide a logical argument, but to elicit an emotional response in the audience. The point would have (and should have) been made without the references to all manner of boogie-men.