3 ms·

> Between the intentional suppression of this and HCQ, While some in the media may have been all to happy to pile on the HCQ fans, I know of no evidence that

> Between the intentional suppression of this and HCQ, While some in the media may have been all to happy to pile on the HCQ fans, I know of no evidence that HCQ works to treat COVID [0]. [0] https://www.methodsman.com/blog/every-hcq-rct-for-covid-19 https://www.methodsman.com/blog/every-hcq-rct-for-covid-19

shaicoleman 5y ago
There was a disinformation campaign against Hydroxychloroquine. In the failed JAMA study, they administered a nearly toxic dose at late stage patients (when there's no viral replication). This is now being investigated. https://www.moneytimes.com.br/heinze-pede-a-pf-que-investigue-estudo-sobre-uso-elevado-de-cloroquina-em-manaus/ https://www.moneytimes.com.br/heinze-pede-a-pf-que-investigu... (in Portuguese) For example, in a peer-reviewed study of 29K patients for early treatment, it showed a 73% reduction in death. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567576921002721 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156757692... There are many other studies showing similar results: https://c19hcq.com/ https://c19hcq.com/ Ivermectin is superior in almost every way, so you won't find too many people advocating for HCQ now. Even Ivermectin is not a silver bullet, that's it's combined with other things for best results. https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-mask-plus-protocol/ https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-mask-pl...