You are saying the response had low quality but don't cite what about it is wrong. If anything, I find this response to my comment as lacking quality. The auth

You are saying the response had low quality but don't cite what about it is wrong. If anything, I find this response to my comment as lacking quality. The author is lying. I stand by the statement that he is lying. He is presenting an imaginary situation where doctors ignore solutions that demonstrate results. That simply isn't the case. If the results were there, it would be done. And it is done. The author isn't asking for doctors to suggest people talk out their problems with religious figures, he's advocating for religion instead of scientifically backed care. I don't care how many articles he publish in some non-peer reviewed junk source like Psychology Today.