6 ms·

One of SpaceX’s rocket leads was 27 at their first successful launch.

ROARosen 5y ago
And how is that comparable with an appointment to the number one top position in the authority over thousands of regulations governing thousands of companies etc. Also I think i's safe to assume you don't just "get appointed" to the lead team in SpaceX you need to actually "show" that you have what it takes. I'm not saying she won't be good, I'm just asking how can we trust?
- ldbooth 5y ago
  At least she's not on the backend of her mental stamina. +1 for being hungry. Unlike congress, who today ignored the homeless ( or pick your) crises to make Juneteenth an official holiday. I'd like to see a lot of under 40 year olds governing if that is the result of "experience".
  - selimthegrim 5y ago
    I suppose they’d rather have Feinstein in charge
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
- JoeJonathan 5y ago
  It's not like she was dragged in off the street. She's an associate professor at Columbia Law.
  - shbooms 5y ago
    more than that, she has direct experience within the FTC and related government bodies [1]: - 2018, worked as a Legal Fellow at the FTC in the office of Commissioner Rohit Chopra - 2019, began serving as counsel to the House Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law - Lead the Democrat's congressional investigation into digital markets and lead the investigation into digital markets. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lina_Khan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lina_Khan
    - elefanten 5y ago
      Yes, she wrote a virally-popular law school review article in 2017. It aligned with a ton of political interests, which no doubt helped buoy it as high as went. She then got invited to do some fellowships, advisory roles, etc... while stepping from law student to associate law school prof. None of that exposes you to the inner workings of industry. Surely, she's a very smart and capable person. But there's a lot you don't learn in academic settings. Regulating trillions of dollars worth of industry with only a theoretical understanding of the market, acquired only from a regulatory perspective, does not inspire confidence.

And how is that comparable with an appointment to the number one top position in the authority over thousands of regulations governing thousands of companies etc. Also I think i's safe to assume you don't just "get appointed" to the lead team in SpaceX you need to actually "show" that you have what it takes. I'm not saying she won't be good, I'm just asking how can we trust?

ldbooth 5y ago
At least she's not on the backend of her mental stamina. +1 for being hungry. Unlike congress, who today ignored the homeless ( or pick your) crises to make Juneteenth an official holiday. I'd like to see a lot of under 40 year olds governing if that is the result of "experience".
- selimthegrim 5y ago
  I suppose they’d rather have Feinstein in charge
deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
JoeJonathan 5y ago
It's not like she was dragged in off the street. She's an associate professor at Columbia Law.
- shbooms 5y ago
  more than that, she has direct experience within the FTC and related government bodies [1]: - 2018, worked as a Legal Fellow at the FTC in the office of Commissioner Rohit Chopra - 2019, began serving as counsel to the House Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law - Lead the Democrat's congressional investigation into digital markets and lead the investigation into digital markets. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lina_Khan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lina_Khan
  - elefanten 5y ago
    Yes, she wrote a virally-popular law school review article in 2017. It aligned with a ton of political interests, which no doubt helped buoy it as high as went. She then got invited to do some fellowships, advisory roles, etc... while stepping from law student to associate law school prof. None of that exposes you to the inner workings of industry. Surely, she's a very smart and capable person. But there's a lot you don't learn in academic settings. Regulating trillions of dollars worth of industry with only a theoretical understanding of the market, acquired only from a regulatory perspective, does not inspire confidence.