3 ms·
Doesn't the virus spread, primarily, first through so-called super-spreader venues/events and then within households? If I read the article correctly, this was
by mariodiana 5y ago
Doesn't the virus spread, primarily, first through so-called super-spreader venues/events and then within households? If I read the article correctly, this was 9 individuals out of 24 thousand. It's plausible that there would be no mass outbreak.
- Izkata 5y agoYeah, I remember an article a month or so ago that mentioned SARS-CoV-2 has a higher "clustering" rating than common cold/flu, which meant a smaller number of people caused more spreading, and that there wouldn't be a noticeable outbreak until the virus reached one of these superspreaders.
- simonh 5y agoThis is why Italy got absolutely hammered quite early on. They were very unlucky to get hit by the mother of all super spreader events. Meanwhile it looks like some other countries like France had a few cases before then, but it died out.