3 ms·
Regardless, the link you sent says that treatment is not a sufficient option, and that protection (prophylaxis) is needed until vaccination.
by manwe150 5y ago
Regardless, the link you sent says that treatment is not a sufficient option, and that protection (prophylaxis) is needed until vaccination.
- thu2111 5y agoHmm I'm not trying to be difficult but where does it say that? I can't find any language like that on the page. Rather the opposite, it says: "Special emphasis must be placed on the harm of excluding trials data supporting ivermectin in the prevention of COVID-19. If the preventive efficacy of ivermectin were to be known or accepted, this would allow deployment in regions without vaccines."
- manwe150 5y agoI wouldn’t say that is the opposite, as it is suggesting both that ivermectin would be needed to be take as a preventative to slow the spread, and implies that vaccination is needed to stop it. My quote is taken from this page: https://covid19criticalcare.com/guide-for-this-website/expanding-our-strategy-to-end-the-pandemic/ https://covid19criticalcare.com/guide-for-this-website/expan...
- thu2111 5y agoAh I see, you're quoting different parts of the website.