3 ms·
No, bootstrap, material, bulma are more popular and would be considered more standard. I don't think a css framework that charges 200, 400 or 800 (team pricing
by ipaddr 5y ago
No, bootstrap, material, bulma are more popular and would be considered more standard.
I don't think a css framework that charges 200, 400 or 800 (team pricing) for the standard ui components will ever reach that status.
- deergomoo 5y agoTailwind UI is a separate thing, and goes far beyond what you’d get with Bootstrap or Bulma. Tailwind by itself is intended for people who don’t want the pre-made components you get with Bootstrap etc.
- mgkimsal 5y agoDoes it go 'far beyond' what you get with something like Vuetify or BootstrapVue? (I've seen they offer react/vue binding/components now).
- deergomoo 5y agoPersonally I think so yes. The available components [0] feel much more designed, like more thought has been put into them, though obviously that's a subjective factor. [0] https://tailwindui.com/#components https://tailwindui.com/#components
- ipaddr 5y agoOpening sourcing tailwinds framework is great. But without the ui components it reduces the appeal to people who can and want to manually build components and needs a guardrail.