It seems absolutely nuts to me that this case ended where it did: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spokeo,_Inc._v._Robins https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spokeo,_In

It seems absolutely nuts to me that this case ended where it did: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spokeo,_Inc._v._Robins https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spokeo,_Inc._v._Robins And we're having a discussion about linkedin might possibly lose. In the spokeo case it's data that Robins said was untrue about him and Spokeo was allowed to keep sharing it - simply because he couldn't prove harm. Which, is laughable in TODAY's political climate where harm is waking up in the morning - because of all the data sharing happening everywhere and being unable to stop it.