3 ms·
If this becomes something like huggingface for Computer Vision - awesome. For now, it's a shame model descriptions seem to often be lifted straight from README.
by wolterlw 5y ago
If this becomes something like huggingface for Computer Vision - awesome.
For now, it's a shame model descriptions seem to often be lifted straight from README.
Having a more standardized description, something like model cards [1] (CV example [2]) would be hugely beneficial IMO.
[1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.03993.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.03993.pdf
[2] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1f39lSzU5Oq-j_OXgS67KfN5wNsoeAZ4V/preview https://drive.google.com/file/d/1f39lSzU5Oq-j_OXgS67KfN5wNso...
- philnelson 5y agoIt's a good suggestion, thanks.
- pepe-sad 5y agoThey looks quite similar. What did you find useful in this card and can't get from a model description?
- joshmarlow 5y agoI hadn't heard of model cards before - thanks for the link! I wonder how feasible it would be to develop some formal ontology to describe the capabilities of models and attach them to model cards. That could open up some interesting applications: * automated search for a set of models to accomplish some task * a human usable search engine for finding specific models EDIT: to complete a sentence