3 ms·
Calling it bureaucracy, whatever the implications, is perfectly fair... assuming we're talking about the subject of this article. This is about 27 separate na
by dalbasal 5y ago
Calling it bureaucracy, whatever the implications, is perfectly fair... assuming we're talking about the subject of this article.
This is about 27 separate national governments to apply separate regulatory procedures, rather than just having Ireland's current gdpr enforcement. That's not necessarily bad, but it is more bureaucracy.
- nr2x 5y agoA major goal of GDPR was to streamline enforcement and reduce compliance cost. Then people thought they could use Ireland to just avoid it, and instead they now have to worry about 27 DPAs, so it utterly backfired. Same dynamic in USA: they blocked national level privacy laws for decades and now they’ll have to deal with 50 state laws instead, which is much more onerous.
- foobiekr 5y agoUS states will not have the same issues that GDPR had. The bounds of enforcement will be much more clear and the US has a much clearer way of dealing with vagueness in laws in general. Despite assurances, US companies do not like the “the statute documents the intent but not all of the specifics” approach the EU uses.